The processes of globalization are
constant and even irreversible today. We can observe their results in all
spheres of people’s life. If spite of that the questions of globalization invoke
more and more discussions.
So how
can we explain what globalization is? There are lots of its definitions. For
some people globalization is associated with erasing of broads between countries, simplifying and speedup
of making bargains. For others it’s creating, development and spreading
of unified culture and values. Generalizing different opinions we can note
that globalization is a condition when
the entire world functions as a single system and each country makes own
and special contribution into its work.
Of course
it’s impossible to define uniquely whether globalization is good or bad. It has
lots of supporters and opponents. Let’s have a look at the
influence of this process on different aspects of modern life and try to note its
positive and negative sides.
First
globalization has a great influence on state economics. The appearance of
multinationals is one of its consequences. Today all the world knows lots of
different brands. Wherever you are, you’ll more likely have an opportunity to
eat at a fast-food restaurant MacDonald’s. You can wash down your dinner with
Coca Cola or Lipton tea. As you see products of multinationals is offered in
every country practically. These firms offer a great amount of working places.
Corporations are engaged in charity sometimes.
But at
the time the multinationals prosper little firms often incur losses.
Actually it’s sometimes very difficult to resist in competition with
worldly recognized companies. As a result there is some aggregation and
concentration of capitals in the hands of multinationals’ leaders. Though there
is a question if it’s that bad? The business of such companies is quiet stable;
therefore it promotes in some ways the installation of stable
economical relationships and economical growth.
Another
one peculiarity of globalization is speedup of life rhythm. There is an
impression that distances among countries shorten. Today the trips for a couple
of days on hundreds of kilometers have become a norm. And if it was considered
to be a great distance then now it’s not a problem. From the other side such
things condition increases the opportunities of emigrants wishing to leave
their country to live in another one. There is a new problem with this moment.
It’s a “brain drain” problem. Some countries lose their highly specialized
specialists in the end, and the costs for their education become ineffective
for the state. Though for the side accepting professionals it’s quite
favorably.
Cultural peculiarities change with
globalization too. They unify in some ways. Besides the mutual penetration
of cultures and their exchange take place. For example being in Russia you
can find Chinese, Japanese, Georgian, French and many other restaurants. With
such means the inhabitants of one country get an opportunity to get acquainted
with national peculiarities of other states. At the same time young generation
is under big influence of American culture which appears in modern cinema,
music etc.
But there is a negative side here. Unfortunately
preferring unified world culture we sometimes forget about our own one.
Traditions and customs are being lost. The youth stops to be interested in
them. Besides less attention is paid to the development of the country culture
in its own unique destination.
Also
there are lots of discussions if it worth regulating the business of
multinationals and in what degree the state has a right to interfere with it.
Big companies open subsidiaries and representations all over the world. But
every country has its own laws which often differ from those working abroad.
That is why it’s important for company
subsidiaries to function in coordination with those normative acts which
are installed in this state.
The world
economics theory proves that the most effective condition is achieved on an
open market. But unfortunately the total world effectiveness is estimated here.
Speaking of one country the conclusions can be quite the opposite. Sometimes
there is a decrease of profits when branches which are not so well developed as
in other countries come to an open market. These branches incur losses and even
stop functioning in the end. And for the whole state that means a partly loss
of independence from foreign suppliers. Though developed countries win here of
course. They increase the sphere of their influence and enlarge the areas of
their markets.
The
consequence of globalization is appearance of a flock of different international
organizations which try to collaterally solve economical, political, and
ethical and many other problems. Though here the extent of countries’ influence
on making decisions often differ.
And the
governments must carry on competent international politics. Each state
needs an interaction with other countries. But they should open the
broads and merge with the world in the degree when the state can worthy
compete with other participants of the world market.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий